Preventing and controlling infectious diseases for Dentists

Recommendations for preventing and controlling infectious diseases and managing personnel health and safety concerns related to infection control within dental settings. The CDC recommends that a surgical mask and eye protection with solid side shields or a face shield be worn to protect mucous membranes of the eyes, nose, and mouth during dental procedures likely to generate splashing or spattering of blood or other body fluids.
Masks are also commonly worn during nonsurgical medical procedures. This is especially valid when airborne-spread diseases are present in a population.

Protecting the practitioner
In recent years, facemasks have also been viewed as an important means to protect healthcare workers (HCW) from potential respiratory disease agents. The primary source of such pathogens is the patient. Sprays, splashes, and some aerosols of body fluids and other potentially infectious materials can be involved. Speaking, coughing, and sneezing also release organisms into the immediate environment.

When occupational risks remain after the institution of engineering and work practice controls, personal protective equipment (PPE) is used. Employers are required to provide PPE, at no cost to the employee. The period of protection under normal conditions depends on mask design. Different types of masks exist for different tasks.
The employer is also required to make PPE readily accessible in the correct sizes and proper types for the hazards present.

About masks
Surgical masks (are disposable and are composed of multiple layers of synthetic (microfiber) filter materials designed to collect and retain microscopic particles. The minimum goal is to filter out at least 95 percent of small particles that directly contact the mask.
Come in a variety of shapes and sizes. Some masks are preformed domes, while others are more pliable. Masks are secured to the user by elastic bands, ear loops, or some type of tie. Most masks are form-fitted over the bridge of the nose and cheeks to reduce fogging of glasses by warm expelled air).
Are examples of regulated FDA medical devices. Characteristics used to describe surgical masks appear in Table 1. Testing of surgical masks occurs primarily in laboratory situations, not in actual use on HCW.
Table 1 – Characteristics of surgical masks
Note: Performance specification is in bold, followed by the definition+
Bacterial Filtration Efficiency, BFE – measures the filtration efficiency by percent of a mask using viable (life) bacterial cells that vary in size from one to five microns (micrometer, µm)
Particulate Filtration Efficiency, PFE – measures the percent efficiency at which a facemask filters particulate (nonviable particles) matter passing through; particles range in size from 0.1 to one micron/micrometer, µm
Delta P, AP, Breathability – measures the differences of air pressure on both sides of a mask; measures the pressure drop across the facemask and is expressed in mm air/cm2
Fluid Resistance – is defined as the ability of a facemask’s material construction to minimize fluid traveling through the material and potentially coming into contact with the user of the facemask
Flammability – the flammability of masks is tested after exposure to a flame.

Breathability or Delta P measures the pressure drop across a facemask. The higher the Delta P values, the more difficult the mask is to breathe through. Persons with breathing difficulties should use masks with lower Delta P values.
Fluid-resistance measures a facemask’s ability to minimize fluids traveling through the material. The greater the fluid resistance of a mask, the lower will be the potential exposure to blood and body fluids caused by splashes, spray, and spatter. Surgical masks are available with fluid resistant outer layers and tissue inner layers or fluid resistant outer and inner layers. Selection as to fluid resistance depends on the procedures conducted and on personal preference.
For the vast majority of dental procedures, a surgical-type mask should be used. A mask with a >95 percent bacterial filtration efficiency should be used. Such masks are sufficiently protective against aerosols and large droplet spatter.

It is recommended that masks be changed every 20 minutes of heavy exposure to fluids or after an hour of normal use. Masks become less effective the wetter they become. Surgical masks are considered to be single-use, disposable items and should be discarded after each patient treatment. Removal of masks involves touching only the ties, bands, or loops.
Wearing surgical masks is not without risk. Masks can irritate facial skin by friction/rubbing. Facemask material can cause irritation or even hypersensitivity. Persons with sensitive skin may be better served through the use of masks with white outer layers and white, nonprinted inner layers.

The majority of surgical facemasks used in dentistry are not certified respirators. Wearing such masks does not protect against TB and does not meet OSHA requirements for respiratory protection. However, there are some surgical masks (surgical N95 respirators) that do meet the requirement and are certified as being respirators by NIOSH.

3 thoughts on “Preventing and controlling infectious diseases for Dentists

  1. Anastasia says:

    The first non medical action involves ‘ scaling and also origin planing ‘ that eliminates plaque as well as tartar deposits on the tooth as well as root surface areas. Sometimes medicine as well as dental rinses may also be suggested by the dental professionals to assist manage the infection as well as pain as well as speed up recovery. Surgery allows the dental professional to reach the areas under the gym and also along the roots where tartar as well as plaque are accumulated.

  2. Richard O.Duda says:

    Presuming you’re in the USA, it’s totally lawful. Your medical insurance might not cover dental therapy; generally that’s an extra price add-on. Your dentist might not function with your insurance company (dental as well as clinical provider are not legally obliged to accept insurance policy payments). $ 55 could be also reduced for your insurance coverage to cover it: there is normally a co-pay/deductible to avoid insurance claims created extremely reduced amounts. The $55 charge for an emergency situation appointment is not unreasonable. The $5 enhancement for infectious illness control does appear to be unreasonable as that should constantly be consisted of as common also when there are no pandemic/epidemic conditions. But that does not make the charge prohibited. Ultimately, if you’re dissatisfied with the terms that certain dental practitioner carries deal, shop around. A mere $60 for any kind of kind of emergency situation consultation is going to be hard to defeat. You could also desire to review your existing insurance for medical/dental protection. .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses cookies to offer you a better browsing experience. By browsing this website, you agree to our use of cookies.